Original Research

Flexible procurement systems is key to supply chain sustainability

Surajit Bag
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management | Vol 10, No 1 | a213 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v10i1.213 | © 2016 Surajit Bag | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 22 September 2015 | Published: 28 April 2016

About the author(s)

Surajit Bag, Tega Industries South Africa (Pty) Ltd., Brakpan, South Africa

Abstract

Background: In this dynamic business environment, manufacturers are focusing primarily on delivery performance and competitive pricing to win orders. It is essential that manufacturers adopt flexible procurement systems (FPSs) in such an uncertain environment for business sustainability.

Objectives: The purpose of the study is to identify the elements of FPSs and model the interrelationships between elements of FPSs and, finally, to understand how FPSs are linked with supply chain sustainability.

Method: Besides providing a brief conceptual review of FPSs, the study largely illustrates the use of an innovative multi-criteria decision-making approach called total interpretive structural modelling (TISM).

Results: The total interpretive structural modelling–based model evaluates the causality and illustrates elements with interpretation of relations and suggests that bottom-level elements are vital for sustainability in FPSs and avert risks. Secondly, strategic sourcing is positively influencing supplier integration. Thirdly, supplier integration positively influences supplier responsiveness. Fourthly, skills of flexible procurement workforce positively influence supplier integration. Fifthly, it is found that supplier integration positively influences flexible transportation. The sixth finding suggests that supplier integration positively influences eco-friendly packaging. The seventh finding highlights that supplier integration positively influences ISO 14001 certifications. The eighth finding explains that supplier responsiveness positively influences customer satisfaction. It is also observed that flexible transport reduces operational cost and environmental costs. The second last finding explains eco-friendly packaging and reduction in environmental cost by careful selection of packing material and chemicals. Lastly, it is found that ISO 14001/environmental certifications reduce environmental costs by greening suppliers and pressurises them to follow environmental norms. This helps in reducing wastage and developing alternate raw materials, which are eco-friendly in nature. Environmental certifications of suppliers help in improving the image of the buyer firm in the business environment and attract more customers.

Conclusion: It is found that FPSs have a positive relationship with supply chain sustainability. In the end, the author highlights implications for supply chain practitioners and researchers.

Keywords: Flexible Procurement; Sustainability; Supply chain network; TISM


Keywords

Flexible Procurement; Sustainability; Supply chain network; TISM

Metrics

Total abstract views: 7010
Total article views: 10984

 

Crossref Citations

1. Role of Green Procurement in Driving Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: Some Exploratory Empirical Results
Surajit Bag
Jindal Journal of Business Research  vol: 6  issue: 2  first page: 155  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1177/2278682117727208

2. Application of TISM and MICMAC for analysis of influential factors of sustainable development of tablet devices: a case study
K. J. Manjunatheshwara, S. Vinodh
International Journal of Sustainable Engineering  vol: 11  issue: 5  first page: 353  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1080/19397038.2017.1387186

3. Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience and reconfiguration: an empirical study in an emerging economy
Maryam Al Naimi, Mohd Nishat Faisal, Rana Sobh, S.M. Fatah Uddin
Journal of Enterprise Information Management  vol: 34  issue: 6  first page: 1722  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2020-0166

4. Análisis de la flexibilidad del proveedor y la participación de abastecimientos en el desempeño de manufactura para el sector de electrodomésticos (Analysis of supplier flexibility and purchasing participation in the manufacturing performance for appliance sector)
Jesus Roberto Martinez Rodriguez, Gustavo Juan Alarcón Martínez
Revista Innovaciones de Negocios  vol: 17  issue: 33  year: 2020  
doi: 10.29105/rinn17.33-6

5. Contextual Relationship Among 3 C's and Innovative Green Procurement Practices Using ISM and Its Validation Using MICMAC Analysis
Surajit Bag
International Journal of Applied Logistics  vol: 6  issue: 2  first page: 33  year: 2016  
doi: 10.4018/IJAL.2016070102

6. The IoT Research in Sustainable Agricultural Supply Chain Management
Arnesh Telukdarie, Pavitra Dhamija
International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation  vol: 9  issue: 2  first page: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4018/IJEEI.2019070101

7. Explaining sustainable supply chain performance using a total interpretive structural modeling approach
K.T. Shibin, Angappa Gunasekaran, Rameshwar Dubey
Sustainable Production and Consumption  vol: 12  first page: 104  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2017.06.003

8. Supplier Management and Sustainable Innovation in Supply Networks: An Empirical Study
Surajit Bag
Global Business Review  vol: 19  issue: 3_suppl  first page: S176  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1177/0972150918760051

9. How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models?
Sushil
Annals of Operations Research  vol: 270  issue: 1-2  first page: 473  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3

10. Driving business performance through green procurement policy: The power of supply chain information sharing for robust supply chain
Varun Chotia, Mahak Sharma, Rsha Alghafes, Steven T. Walsh
Technovation  vol: 149  first page: 103358  year: 2026  
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103358

11. Importance of innovation and flexibility in configuring supply network sustainability
Surajit Bag, Shivam Gupta, Arnesh Telukdarie
Benchmarking: An International Journal  vol: 25  issue: 9  first page: 3951  year: 2018  
doi: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2017-0132