Original Research
Flexible procurement systems is key to supply chain sustainability
Submitted: 22 September 2015 | Published: 28 April 2016
About the author(s)
Surajit Bag, Tega Industries South Africa (Pty) Ltd., Brakpan, South AfricaAbstract
Background: In this dynamic business environment, manufacturers are focusing primarily on delivery performance and competitive pricing to win orders. It is essential that manufacturers adopt flexible procurement systems (FPSs) in such an uncertain environment for business sustainability.
Objectives: The purpose of the study is to identify the elements of FPSs and model the interrelationships between elements of FPSs and, finally, to understand how FPSs are linked with supply chain sustainability.
Method: Besides providing a brief conceptual review of FPSs, the study largely illustrates the use of an innovative multi-criteria decision-making approach called total interpretive structural modelling (TISM).
Results: The total interpretive structural modelling–based model evaluates the causality and illustrates elements with interpretation of relations and suggests that bottom-level elements are vital for sustainability in FPSs and avert risks. Secondly, strategic sourcing is positively influencing supplier integration. Thirdly, supplier integration positively influences supplier responsiveness. Fourthly, skills of flexible procurement workforce positively influence supplier integration. Fifthly, it is found that supplier integration positively influences flexible transportation. The sixth finding suggests that supplier integration positively influences eco-friendly packaging. The seventh finding highlights that supplier integration positively influences ISO 14001 certifications. The eighth finding explains that supplier responsiveness positively influences customer satisfaction. It is also observed that flexible transport reduces operational cost and environmental costs. The second last finding explains eco-friendly packaging and reduction in environmental cost by careful selection of packing material and chemicals. Lastly, it is found that ISO 14001/environmental certifications reduce environmental costs by greening suppliers and pressurises them to follow environmental norms. This helps in reducing wastage and developing alternate raw materials, which are eco-friendly in nature. Environmental certifications of suppliers help in improving the image of the buyer firm in the business environment and attract more customers.
Conclusion: It is found that FPSs have a positive relationship with supply chain sustainability. In the end, the author highlights implications for supply chain practitioners and researchers.
Keywords: Flexible Procurement; Sustainability; Supply chain network; TISM
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 7010Total article views: 10984
Crossref Citations
1. Role of Green Procurement in Driving Sustainable Innovation in Supplier Networks: Some Exploratory Empirical Results
Surajit Bag
Jindal Journal of Business Research vol: 6 issue: 2 first page: 155 year: 2017
doi: 10.1177/2278682117727208
2. Application of TISM and MICMAC for analysis of influential factors of sustainable development of tablet devices: a case study
K. J. Manjunatheshwara, S. Vinodh
International Journal of Sustainable Engineering vol: 11 issue: 5 first page: 353 year: 2018
doi: 10.1080/19397038.2017.1387186
3. Antecedents and consequences of supply chain resilience and reconfiguration: an empirical study in an emerging economy
Maryam Al Naimi, Mohd Nishat Faisal, Rana Sobh, S.M. Fatah Uddin
Journal of Enterprise Information Management vol: 34 issue: 6 first page: 1722 year: 2021
doi: 10.1108/JEIM-04-2020-0166
4. Análisis de la flexibilidad del proveedor y la participación de abastecimientos en el desempeño de manufactura para el sector de electrodomésticos (Analysis of supplier flexibility and purchasing participation in the manufacturing performance for appliance sector)
Jesus Roberto Martinez Rodriguez, Gustavo Juan Alarcón Martínez
Revista Innovaciones de Negocios vol: 17 issue: 33 year: 2020
doi: 10.29105/rinn17.33-6
5. Contextual Relationship Among 3 C's and Innovative Green Procurement Practices Using ISM and Its Validation Using MICMAC Analysis
Surajit Bag
International Journal of Applied Logistics vol: 6 issue: 2 first page: 33 year: 2016
doi: 10.4018/IJAL.2016070102
6. The IoT Research in Sustainable Agricultural Supply Chain Management
Arnesh Telukdarie, Pavitra Dhamija
International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation vol: 9 issue: 2 first page: 1 year: 2019
doi: 10.4018/IJEEI.2019070101
7. Explaining sustainable supply chain performance using a total interpretive structural modeling approach
K.T. Shibin, Angappa Gunasekaran, Rameshwar Dubey
Sustainable Production and Consumption vol: 12 first page: 104 year: 2017
doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2017.06.003
8. Supplier Management and Sustainable Innovation in Supply Networks: An Empirical Study
Surajit Bag
Global Business Review vol: 19 issue: 3_suppl first page: S176 year: 2018
doi: 10.1177/0972150918760051
9. How to check correctness of total interpretive structural models?
Sushil
Annals of Operations Research vol: 270 issue: 1-2 first page: 473 year: 2018
doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2312-3
10. Driving business performance through green procurement policy: The power of supply chain information sharing for robust supply chain
Varun Chotia, Mahak Sharma, Rsha Alghafes, Steven T. Walsh
Technovation vol: 149 first page: 103358 year: 2026
doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103358
11. Importance of innovation and flexibility in configuring supply network sustainability
Surajit Bag, Shivam Gupta, Arnesh Telukdarie
Benchmarking: An International Journal vol: 25 issue: 9 first page: 3951 year: 2018
doi: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2017-0132