Original Research
Drivers and barriers to green supply chain management in the South African cement industry
Submitted: 10 January 2021 | Published: 26 May 2021
About the author(s)
Ayanda Nteta, School of Business Leadership, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Midrand, South AfricaJustine Mushonga, School of Business Leadership, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Midrand, South Africa
Abstract
Background: The cement industry in South Africa is lagging behind the green supply chain management (GSCM) revolution that has influenced many sectors to re-evaluate their supply chain systems.
Objective: This study was conducted to determine the significant drivers of and barriers to the implementation of GSCM in the South African cement industry, and thus to investigate the impediments to the implementation of GSCM in the cement industry.
Method: A mixed-method approach was used to collect data from various role-players in the cement value chain. Geometric means were calculated from the scores of the survey conducted. Interviews were also conducted to confirm the results of the survey. An analytical hierarchy process technique ranked the individual drivers and barriers using the results from pairwise comparisons conducted. After ranking the drivers and barriers, a Pareto analysis was applied to determine the most significant drivers and barriers for the South African cement industry.
Results: Overall, the seven most significant sub-drivers fall into three categories of main drivers: financial performance, competitors and organisational style. Ten barriers were identified as most significant and were categorised into five themes, namely, high capital costs, poor supplier commitment, high certification costs, weak marketing positioning and lack of awareness of GSCM.
Conclusion: The identification of these drivers and barriers contributes to further research on improvements to GSCM process in the cement industry. The study shows that drivers of and barriers to the implementation of GSCM are not universally standard, and the ranking varies from one industry to another and from one country to another.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 8059Total article views: 9246
Crossref Citations
1. Barriers for adoption of green supply chain management in cement industry: an interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach
Varun Chotia, Swati Soni, Girish Jain, Armando Papa
Annals of Operations Research vol: 355 issue: 1 first page: 253 year: 2025
doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05724-5
2. An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for overcoming barriers to green supply chain management and prioritizing alternative solutions
Alper Özaşkın, Ali Görener
Supply Chain Analytics vol: 3 first page: 100027 year: 2023
doi: 10.1016/j.sca.2023.100027
3. Exploring the Challenges to Adopt Green Initiatives to Supply Chain Management for Manufacturing Industries
Abbott Po Shun Chen, Yung-Fu Huang, Manh-Hoang Do
Sustainability vol: 14 issue: 20 first page: 13516 year: 2022
doi: 10.3390/su142013516
4. Organisational culture and institutionalisation of green supply chain management
Mangakane Johanna Lunga, David Pooe
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293) vol: 6 issue: 4 first page: 56 year: 2024
doi: 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.512
5. The adoption of green supply chain management in entrepreneurship and its impact on business sustainability: lessons for South African SMEs
Charles Tsikada, Wimbayi Chasaya, Ayansola O Ayandibu
Future Business Journal vol: 11 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.1186/s43093-025-00617-4
6. Supply Chain Management Practices, Information Advancement and Organizational Performance of Large Flour Milling Companies in Nairobi City County.Kenya
Lewis Kinyua Kiringa , Dr Jackson Ndolo
International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p) vol: 1 issue: 1 first page: 423 year: 2023
doi: 10.61108/ijsshr.v1i1.39
7. Green Supply Chain Practices: Toward A Sustainable Industry Development
Susana Duarte, Maria do Rosário Cabrita, V. Cruz-Machado, J. Xu, A. Windapo, M.H.A. Hassan, A. Hajiyev
E3S Web of Conferences vol: 409 first page: 01004 year: 2023
doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340901004
8. A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Green Logistics Practices Through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
Laura Jefimovaitė, Milita Vienažindienė
Logistics vol: 10 issue: 2 first page: 25 year: 2026
doi: 10.3390/logistics10020025
9. Can sustainable and digital objectives synchronize? A study of ESG activities for digital supply chains using multi‐methods
Arpit Singh, Ashish Dwivedi, Dindayal Agrawal, Surajit Bag, Anurag Chauhan
Business Strategy and the Environment vol: 33 issue: 8 first page: 8413 year: 2024
doi: 10.1002/bse.3925
10. Assessing the obstacles to green supply chain management in Bangladesh's footwear industry using SWARA and ISM-MICMAC methods
Mst. Anjuman Ara, Mafia Sultana, Sadia Sultana Mou, Md. Sadman Azim Sakib, Md. Abdus Shabur
Discover Sustainability vol: 5 issue: 1 year: 2024
doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00657-w