Original Research

Drivers and barriers to green supply chain management in the South African cement industry

Ayanda Nteta, Justine Mushonga
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management | Vol 15 | a571 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v15i0.571 | © 2021 Ayanda Nteta, Justine Mushonga | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 January 2021 | Published: 26 May 2021

About the author(s)

Ayanda Nteta, School of Business Leadership, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Midrand, South Africa
Justine Mushonga, School of Business Leadership, Faculty of Management Sciences, University of South Africa, Midrand, South Africa

Abstract

Background: The cement industry in South Africa is lagging behind the green supply chain management (GSCM) revolution that has influenced many sectors to re-evaluate their supply chain systems.

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the significant drivers of and barriers to the implementation of GSCM in the South African cement industry, and thus to investigate the impediments to the implementation of GSCM in the cement industry.

Method: A mixed-method approach was used to collect data from various role-players in the cement value chain. Geometric means were calculated from the scores of the survey conducted. Interviews were also conducted to confirm the results of the survey. An analytical hierarchy process technique ranked the individual drivers and barriers using the results from pairwise comparisons conducted. After ranking the drivers and barriers, a Pareto analysis was applied to determine the most significant drivers and barriers for the South African cement industry.

Results: Overall, the seven most significant sub-drivers fall into three categories of main drivers: financial performance, competitors and organisational style. Ten barriers were identified as most significant and were categorised into five themes, namely, high capital costs, poor supplier commitment, high certification costs, weak marketing positioning and lack of awareness of GSCM.

Conclusion: The identification of these drivers and barriers contributes to further research on improvements to GSCM process in the cement industry. The study shows that drivers of and barriers to the implementation of GSCM are not universally standard, and the ranking varies from one industry to another and from one country to another.


Keywords

analytical hierarchy process; cement industry; green; supply chain management; pareto analysis.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 8059
Total article views: 9246

 

Crossref Citations

1. Barriers for adoption of green supply chain management in cement industry: an interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach
Varun Chotia, Swati Soni, Girish Jain, Armando Papa
Annals of Operations Research  vol: 355  issue: 1  first page: 253  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05724-5

2. An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach for overcoming barriers to green supply chain management and prioritizing alternative solutions
Alper Özaşkın, Ali Görener
Supply Chain Analytics  vol: 3  first page: 100027  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1016/j.sca.2023.100027

3. Exploring the Challenges to Adopt Green Initiatives to Supply Chain Management for Manufacturing Industries
Abbott Po Shun Chen, Yung-Fu Huang, Manh-Hoang Do
Sustainability  vol: 14  issue: 20  first page: 13516  year: 2022  
doi: 10.3390/su142013516

4. Organisational culture and institutionalisation of green supply chain management
Mangakane Johanna Lunga, David Pooe
International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293)  vol: 6  issue: 4  first page: 56  year: 2024  
doi: 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.512

5. The adoption of green supply chain management in entrepreneurship and its impact on business sustainability: lessons for South African SMEs
Charles Tsikada, Wimbayi Chasaya, Ayansola O Ayandibu
Future Business Journal  vol: 11  issue: 1  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1186/s43093-025-00617-4

6. Supply Chain Management Practices, Information Advancement and Organizational Performance of Large Flour Milling Companies in Nairobi City County.Kenya
Lewis Kinyua Kiringa , Dr Jackson Ndolo
International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR) ISSN 2959-7056 (o); 2959-7048 (p)  vol: 1  issue: 1  first page: 423  year: 2023  
doi: 10.61108/ijsshr.v1i1.39

7. Green Supply Chain Practices: Toward A Sustainable Industry Development
Susana Duarte, Maria do Rosário Cabrita, V. Cruz-Machado, J. Xu, A. Windapo, M.H.A. Hassan, A. Hajiyev
E3S Web of Conferences  vol: 409  first page: 01004  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340901004

8. A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Green Logistics Practices Through Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
Laura Jefimovaitė, Milita Vienažindienė
Logistics  vol: 10  issue: 2  first page: 25  year: 2026  
doi: 10.3390/logistics10020025

9. Can sustainable and digital objectives synchronize? A study of ESG activities for digital supply chains using multi‐methods
Arpit Singh, Ashish Dwivedi, Dindayal Agrawal, Surajit Bag, Anurag Chauhan
Business Strategy and the Environment  vol: 33  issue: 8  first page: 8413  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1002/bse.3925

10. Assessing the obstacles to green supply chain management in Bangladesh's footwear industry using SWARA and ISM-MICMAC methods
Mst. Anjuman Ara, Mafia Sultana, Sadia Sultana Mou, Md. Sadman Azim Sakib, Md. Abdus Shabur
Discover Sustainability  vol: 5  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00657-w