Original Research

Geopolitical disruptions and Saudi Arabia’s emergence as a global logistics stabilisation hub

Islam El-Nakib, Sarah Osailan, Hassan Balfaqih, Nermin M. Gohar, Sara Elzarka
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management | Vol 20 | a1436 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v20i0.1436 | © 2026 Islam El-Nakib, Sarah Osailan, Hassan Balfaqih, Nermin M. Gohar, Sara Elzarka | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 20 May 2026 | Published: 02 October 2026

About the author(s)

Islam El-Nakib, Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, Effat University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Sarah Osailan, Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, Effat University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Hassan Balfaqih, Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, Effat University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Nermin M. Gohar, Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, Effat University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Sara Elzarka, Department of Operations and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, Effat University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Global supply chains remain highly exposed to geopolitical instability affecting critical maritime chokepoints across the Middle East, including the Strait of Hormuz, Bab el-Mandeb and the Suez Canal. Disruptions in these corridors can reverberate through logistics networks, increase supply chain risk exposure and weaken trade continuity.
Objectives: This study examines whether Saudi Arabia can function as a logistics stabilisation hub by connecting Red Sea gateways, Gulf ports, inland logistics corridors, energy logistics assets and digital logistics systems.
Method: A structured survey of 300 logistics professionals was analysed using structural equation modelling. The model tested the relationships between geopolitical instability, maritime logistics disruptions, supply chain risk exposure, logistics stabilisation hub capability and supply chain stability.
Results: Geopolitical instability increased maritime logistics disruptions, and maritime disruptions increased supply chain risk exposure. Supply chain risk exposure reduced global supply chain stability. Logistics stabilisation hub capability moderated the disruption–stability relationship and supported regional supply chain resilience.
Conclusion: National logistics systems can reduce the destabilising effects of maritime chokepoint disruption when they provide multimodal redundancy, energy-logistics continuity and digital cargo visibility.
Contribution: The study extends hub theory by framing logistics hubs as stabilisation infrastructure rather than only trade facilitation assets.


Keywords

Saudi Arabia; geopolitical risk; logistics hubs; supply chain resilience; maritime logistics disruptions; energy logistics; global trade corridors; logistics infrastructure

JEL Codes

F51: International Conflicts • Negotiations • Sanctions; H54: Infrastructures • Other Public Investment and Capital Stock; L91: Transportation: General; R41: Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion • Travel Time • Safety and Accidents • Transportation Noise; R42: Government and Private Investment Analysis • Road Maintenance • Transportation Planning

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Metrics

Total abstract views: 550
Total article views: 420


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.