Original Research

Seaport logistics providers’ effect on trade

Ahlem Hamri, Rafaa Mraihi, Noomen Guirat
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management | Vol 20 | a1274 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v20i0.1274 | © 2026 Ahlem Hamri, Rafaa Mraihi, Noomen Guirat | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 17 October 2025 | Published: 18 May 2026

About the author(s)

Ahlem Hamri, Department of Economics, Higher School of Business of Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
Rafaa Mraihi, Department of Economics, Higher School of Business of Tunis, Manouba, Tunisia
Noomen Guirat, Institut Supérieur de Gestion Industrielle de Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the role of logistics clusters, specifically logistics providers (LP), on international trade, focusing on Rades Port in Tunisia. We aim to assess how the co-location of logistic service providers (LSPs) affects port connectivity and trade flows, and how the competence and productivity of logistics services contribute to export performance.
Objectives: The research analyses the effect of logistics clusters, particularly the co-located seaport logistics providers, on trade dynamics, focusing on exports from Rades port to its eight main importers.
Method: The gravity model incorporates variables such as importer gross domestic product (GDP), distance, and measures of capital productivity of LSPs, both those co-located within LP and those operating outside.
Results: The results confirm a positive correlation between the GDP of importing countries and trade volumes, highlighting the role of economic size in driving exports. Interestingly, the capital productivity of LSPs co-located within the LP is found to negatively impact trade, suggesting potential inefficiencies or overconcentration. In contrast, a 10% increase in the capital productivity of LSPs located outside the platform corresponds to a 14% increase in trade. Additionally, a 10% reduction in geographical distance between countries leads to a 16% increase in exports, reinforcing traditional gravity model expectations.
Conclusion: The findings have important implications for logistics and port policy. Policymakers should reconsider how logistics clusters are managed and supported, as simple co-location may not guarantee improved performance. Enhancing service quality and ensuring competitive dynamics within LPs may be more critical for trade facilitation.
Contribution: The study offers novel insights into how logistics infrastructure and organisational factors influence trade from a major North African port.


Keywords

port; logistics providers; trade; localisation economies; gravity model; cluster

JEL Codes

A11: Role of Economics • Role of Economists • Market for Economists

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 9: Industry, innovation and infrastructure

Metrics

Total abstract views: 338
Total article views: 414


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.