Original Research

The opportunity cost of household transport expenditure in South Africa

Mienke Knipe, Stephan Krygsman
Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management | Vol 18 | a1081 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/jtscm.v18i0.1081 | © 2024 Mienke Knipe, Stephan Krygsman | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 30 August 2024 | Published: 10 December 2024

About the author(s)

Mienke Knipe, Department of Logistics, Faculty of Economic Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
Stephan Krygsman, Department of Logistics, Faculty of Economic Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Transport affordability is a significant concern for South African households, who spend nearly a fifth of their budgets on transport. Contributing factors include a lack of affordable public transport options and spatial mismatch. Since 2015, stagnating national budgets and a declining share allocated to the transport portfolio have exacerbated household transport expenses, limiting economic mobility.

Objectives: This article examines how changes in household transport expenses impact other essential expenses such as food, housing, clothing, recreation and education. Understanding these expenditure trade-offs provides insights for policy, especially as the National Public Transport Subsidy Policy is being prepared.

Method: Using data from the Living Conditions Survey of 2014/2015, the study applies fractional logit regression models to estimate the impact of varying household transport expenses on other expenditure categories across diverse household demographics.

Results: Findings indicate that increased household transport expenses significantly reduces allocations to essential items, notably food and housing, with the effects varying by income level, settlement type, and household composition.

Conclusion: A core recommendation is to reduce transport expenses for low-income households through government intervention as this will increase these, mostly previously disadvantaged households’, economic mobility.

Contribution: Results show that if low-income households allocate no more than 10% of their expenditure budgets to transport, they could potentially increase their expenditure share on food (+1.30%) housing (+1.18%) clothing (+0.86%) recreation (+0.31%) and education (+0.08%).


Keywords

transport expenditure; household expenditure; transport subsidisation; transport justice; mobility inequality; transport poverty

JEL Codes

D63: Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; L88: Government Policy; L91: Transportation: General; N77: Africa • Oceania; R40: General; R41: Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion • Travel Time • Safety and Accidents • Transportation Noise; R48: Government Pricing and Policy

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 11: Sustainable cities and communities

Metrics

Total abstract views: 203
Total article views: 190


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.